GRAVITY, MASS AND WEIGHT
Gravity, mass and weight are concepts that men have struggled to understand for centuries. What are they? How are they created? What are they made of? We can see the effects of them, but we cannot exactly get a handle on what they are or why they work.
Before you finish reading this page I hope to help you understand a little better.
We need to start with something understandable and widely accepted. Let’s start with Einstein’s theory that E=mc2 (sorry, this program will let let me represent the "2" as squared). It is a great equation, but not very specific. What measurement unit is used to figure E, ditto with m, c equals a constant which is the speed of light, but what type of measurement is used to determine the figures to punch in for the speed of light to work the equation ? It is different from specific equations like 1+1= 2 . It doesn’t matter if it is two feathers, cars, trains, aircraft carriers, stars, etc. One plus 1 of anything always equals two of them, but the same cannot be said for Einstein’s famous equation.
What Einstein’s equation does tell us in philosophical terms is that a whole bunch of energy is contained within a small amount of matter and when the energy in matter is released you are going to get a really big reaction from it.
However, this philosophical equation also tells us something that has been mostly ignored; that it must take a massive amount of force to hold all that energy together to form an atom. This obvious question is “what force ?”
Science understands the makeup of atoms very well. It can even construct a periodic chart to explain how many electrons, protons, neutrons, and their derivatives are contained in any form of matter.
Science can tell us that the more electrons, protons, and neutrons are contained in an atom the greater will be its weight. But science cannot explain where the weight or mass of the atom comes from because those subatomic particles are energy which theoretically have no weight.
Well , if we understand Einstein’s equation and understand that there must be a massive force that holds all of that energy together in an atom to create matter we must then examine the makeup of an atom , or the way it is constructed. Our best understanding today is that there is a Nucleus made up of protons and neutrons and their derivatives, we know that orbiting around that Nucleus are electrons. We know that the electrons are held together by some force from the Nucleus. But what we have to understand is that the "force" holding the electrons to the Nucleus can escape from the atom at the points around the Nucleus where the electrons are not present. Simply, the outer part of an atom is not a solid sphere, but is more comparable to planets orbiting around a sun, except at an incredibly fast speed. The gaps between the electrons allow the force that binds the atoms together to escape through those gaps in the same fashion as the gaps between the planets allow sunlight to escape.
The force that holds the particles of atoms together to form matter and which escapes then attracts other parts of atoms in other matter. The result of that escaping force is what we know as gravity. The more parts in an atom that need to be held together to form matter then the greater the force that is needed to hold those parts together and the greater is the force is that that escapes in the gaps between the electrons , which simply means that an atom with more parts is going to exert a greater force ( i.e. weight or gravity) to attract other atoms near it.
Thus the greater the mass (electrons, protons, neutrons, etc) that something has the greater will be is ability to attract other matter to it because there must be a greater force used to hold it together. On a planet, moon or star there is great mass therefore great gravity . Once we understand how we get mass and weight from some thing made up of things that have no weight we should be able to figure out how to counter act that force.
Since the “anti” of anything has to exist in order for that thing to be made from nothing, then there must be a force that drives matter apart just like gravity pulls matter ( and light and magnetic waves , etc) together . The problem is that something is missing from our base of knowledge that allows us to do that. It is like a lost city that we know is there we just have not discovered it yet. Or have we?
Science understands the makeup of atoms very well. It can even construct a periodic chart to explain how many electrons, protons, neutrons, and their derivatives are contained in any form of matter.
Science can tell us that the more electrons, protons, and neutrons are contained in an atom the greater will be its weight. But science cannot explain where the weight or mass of the atom comes from because those subatomic particles are energy which theoretically have no weight.
Well , if we understand Einstein’s equation and understand that there must be a massive force that holds all of that energy together in an atom to create matter we must then examine the makeup of an atom , or the way it is constructed. Our best understanding today is that there is a Nucleus made up of protons and neutrons and their derivatives, we know that orbiting around that Nucleus are electrons. We know that the electrons are held together by some force from the Nucleus. But what we have to understand is that the "force" holding the electrons to the Nucleus can escape from the atom at the points around the Nucleus where the electrons are not present. Simply, the outer part of an atom is not a solid sphere, but is more comparable to planets orbiting around a sun, except at an incredibly fast speed. The gaps between the electrons allow the force that binds the atoms together to escape through those gaps in the same fashion as the gaps between the planets allow sunlight to escape.
The force that holds the particles of atoms together to form matter and which escapes then attracts other parts of atoms in other matter. The result of that escaping force is what we know as gravity. The more parts in an atom that need to be held together to form matter then the greater the force that is needed to hold those parts together and the greater is the force is that that escapes in the gaps between the electrons , which simply means that an atom with more parts is going to exert a greater force ( i.e. weight or gravity) to attract other atoms near it.
Thus the greater the mass (electrons, protons, neutrons, etc) that something has the greater will be is ability to attract other matter to it because there must be a greater force used to hold it together. On a planet, moon or star there is great mass therefore great gravity . Once we understand how we get mass and weight from some thing made up of things that have no weight we should be able to figure out how to counter act that force.
Since the “anti” of anything has to exist in order for that thing to be made from nothing, then there must be a force that drives matter apart just like gravity pulls matter ( and light and magnetic waves , etc) together . The problem is that something is missing from our base of knowledge that allows us to do that. It is like a lost city that we know is there we just have not discovered it yet. Or have we?
We can overcome gravity with various machines like airplanes, balloons, blimps, helicopters , rockets and such. We can overcome gravity ourselves by simply jumping off the ground. However, we have thus far been unable to discover the force that would allow us to counteract gravity.
The new propulsion systems used in the Governments secret triangular shaped aircraft the ASTRA- TR-3B (that was reportedly reversed engineered from alien flying-saucers) is a much advanced system of propulsion, but is just another gravity-defeating system. It is a highly advanced gravity defeating technology, but is just another rung on the same ladder of other gravity defeating devices that start with a man peddling a machine that turns a propeller to move a winged craft into the air. Furthermore, it is a propulsion system that would likely be highly vulnerable to disruption by a tightly focused beam of electromagnetic energy.
What is needed is a true anti-gravity system of propulsion. The force for that system would have to be similar to the force that theoretically drove all matter outward in the big bang scenario ( again I personally don't think that theory is correct) and theoretically continues to drive galaxies apart today. That force must come from the thing that makes up the center of particles of an atom, some speculate it is a force called a Bozon. If we assume that thing is either made of consciousness or is something that was made by consciousness, then we are looking for something that is the “anti” of the force holding matter together. That force must be all over the Universe, but we just cannot put our finger on it yet, we are like that chimpanzee that cannot comprehend calculus with respect to this problem, or can we?
The Universe appears to be expanding, but science cannot identify the force that is actually causing the expansion. It has been believed that something is causing the Galaxies to move away from one another therefore some force must be pushing them apart. However, it may be that what is actually occurring is that nothing is pushing the galaxies away from one another , but instead the Universe is being "pulled" at its edges into the "nothingness" , similar to water flowing into fill a void. Therefore the Universe may be expanding not because of a force "pushing" it apart, but because it is being "pulled” into the nothingness of space at its edges.
It is similar to a snowflake in a glacier. If a snowflake at a certain point in the glacier would explore the glacier around it would appear that all the snow and ice in the region was a certain age and it would look like the other snow and ice in the glacier was moving. One could then logically conclude that the glacier was the age of the adjacent ice , say 10,000 years when the entire glacier may actually be 100,000 or 1,000,000 years old. Additionally, one could also logically conclude that there must have been a big explosion to cause the glacier to move as it is obviously moving. The same is likely true of the observable Universe. It is highly probable that the Universe is both much older and larger than we currently believe and that there was never a "big bang" which started it but that it developed slowly and now is constantly rebuilding itself by recycling/recreating matter and energy as it flows into the void at its outer edges.
The new propulsion systems used in the Governments secret triangular shaped aircraft the ASTRA- TR-3B (that was reportedly reversed engineered from alien flying-saucers) is a much advanced system of propulsion, but is just another gravity-defeating system. It is a highly advanced gravity defeating technology, but is just another rung on the same ladder of other gravity defeating devices that start with a man peddling a machine that turns a propeller to move a winged craft into the air. Furthermore, it is a propulsion system that would likely be highly vulnerable to disruption by a tightly focused beam of electromagnetic energy.
What is needed is a true anti-gravity system of propulsion. The force for that system would have to be similar to the force that theoretically drove all matter outward in the big bang scenario ( again I personally don't think that theory is correct) and theoretically continues to drive galaxies apart today. That force must come from the thing that makes up the center of particles of an atom, some speculate it is a force called a Bozon. If we assume that thing is either made of consciousness or is something that was made by consciousness, then we are looking for something that is the “anti” of the force holding matter together. That force must be all over the Universe, but we just cannot put our finger on it yet, we are like that chimpanzee that cannot comprehend calculus with respect to this problem, or can we?
The Universe appears to be expanding, but science cannot identify the force that is actually causing the expansion. It has been believed that something is causing the Galaxies to move away from one another therefore some force must be pushing them apart. However, it may be that what is actually occurring is that nothing is pushing the galaxies away from one another , but instead the Universe is being "pulled" at its edges into the "nothingness" , similar to water flowing into fill a void. Therefore the Universe may be expanding not because of a force "pushing" it apart, but because it is being "pulled” into the nothingness of space at its edges.
It is similar to a snowflake in a glacier. If a snowflake at a certain point in the glacier would explore the glacier around it would appear that all the snow and ice in the region was a certain age and it would look like the other snow and ice in the glacier was moving. One could then logically conclude that the glacier was the age of the adjacent ice , say 10,000 years when the entire glacier may actually be 100,000 or 1,000,000 years old. Additionally, one could also logically conclude that there must have been a big explosion to cause the glacier to move as it is obviously moving. The same is likely true of the observable Universe. It is highly probable that the Universe is both much older and larger than we currently believe and that there was never a "big bang" which started it but that it developed slowly and now is constantly rebuilding itself by recycling/recreating matter and energy as it flows into the void at its outer edges.
Perhaps the "anti-force" needed to defeat gravity is some type of "anti- consciousness" but the only thing "anti" to consciousness is "nothing". If "consciousness" is the "force" holding atoms together , and the "force" escaping from the nucleus of the atom to hold the electrons in place is the "force" that creates "gravity" then if that force is removed from the an atom then the resulting "energy" which remain would logically seem to be the thing that is the "anti" of gravity. However, when that force is removed suddenly and violently the result is a nuclear explosion. If we could find a way to remove that "force" without causing an explosion , then perhaps we could harness the "anti" of gravity which is nothing.
Alternatively, if we created a "nothingness" hole in front of a craft the craft would be drawn or pulled into the nothingness at a speed near infinite and the speed would be reduced as the size of the nothingness hole was reduced and increase correspondingly with an increase in the nothingness hole.
To conclude , the force that holds atoms together and creates gravity is consciousness. The gravitational force (like all other forces) is a property of consciousness , the same as matter and energy.
Alternatively, if we created a "nothingness" hole in front of a craft the craft would be drawn or pulled into the nothingness at a speed near infinite and the speed would be reduced as the size of the nothingness hole was reduced and increase correspondingly with an increase in the nothingness hole.
To conclude , the force that holds atoms together and creates gravity is consciousness. The gravitational force (like all other forces) is a property of consciousness , the same as matter and energy.